Blog Assignment

Thursday, January 17, 2019

WEEK 1: “Who is Felix Tshisekedi, DR Congo’s President Elect?”

“Who is Felix Tshisekedi, DR Congo’s President Elect?”

Felix Tshisekedi, Congo's President-Elect
Summary:
Though he is a relatively new political figure, the leader of the Union for Democracy and Social Progress party Felix Tshisekedi was announced as the unexpected winner of the preliminary presidential elections in Congo. His opposers, as well as many western Powers, doubt the legitimacy of the verdict. His closest challenger and the nations expected president-elect was Martin Fayulu, the head of the Engagement for Citizenship and Development party. According to the electoral board, Tshisekedi won with 38.57 percent of the votes, while Fayulu aquired 34.8 percent. These results caused a commotion among the citizens, which included several violent outbreaks that led to the death of at least four people. It is not new however, because Congo has never had a peaceful transfer of power.

Joseph Kabila, Congos former president 2006-2018
          Joseph Kabila, the outgoing president of 12 years, finally agreed to step down after refusing to leave office when his term expired in December 2016. Kabila, like the other four leaders who have ruled Congo before him, governs with corruption and mismanagement. The congolese have experienced poor public health, little educational resources, and the lack of infrastructure; all of which have been caused by the history of corrupt leadership. Although Congo is rich in mineral resources, about 7.7 million of the 80 million citizens still live in poverty, while a small percentage are among the country's most highly privileged. with that social imbalance comes economic and governmental instability, which has left the majority of Congolese frustrated with their administration.
          When the presidential candidates were announced, people strongly believed that Fayulu would win. He was the country's favorite since he often led protests against the governmentt's extremely corrupt regime. As a presidential candidate, he aimed to reinstate stability for the country, and redirect the mining and oil contracts to benefit the large majority of the exploited population. Tshisekedi was also an opposition leader who strived to make the battle against poverty his priority by inreasing the average income per person. However, he was not the most poopular among the Congolese since may people criticized him for his lack of charisma and political experience, and deriving his political leitimacy from his father, who was the long-time leader of Tshisekedi's current party.
          Though both candidates share similar goals for their presidency, the citizens remain angered and baffled at the result of the election. Many people associate Tshisekedi's victory to corruption and blame him for a mysterious fire that destroyed 8,000 voting machines 10 days prior to the presidential elections.

Reaction:
          Living in the United States, I have never experienced the same level of corruption from my government compared to the Congoleses'. I imagine that their life must be difficult to bear, having to work for such little pay for giant oil companies owned by millionaires. I do agree that many companies in the US, like Congo, are benefitting too much on the labor of citizens that earn a tiny fraction of what they earn, which ultimately contributes to their poverty. If I was to vote in the elections, I probably would have chosen Fayulu, because Tshisekedi seems too inexperienced to handle all of the problems that plague Congo. Personally, it seemed like he was only running because his father was a prominent political figure, and he is merely following in his footsteps. I also feel as though Fayulu was more "for the people" than his opponents. He has real experience in business, which could have been good for managing the oil and mineral companies in Congo to help reduce poverty.

Connection:
          During the cold war, it was expressed in Patrice Lumumba's letter to his wife that Congo, at the time, was struggling for independence from Belgium and their western allies. Lumumba wrote that Congoleses' "freedom [had] been turned into a cage," which bears a similarity to how people felt under Joseph Kabila's (and previous leaders') corrupt leadership. In addition, Kabila forcing Congolese to endure his presidency two years after its expiration advertises an uncanny resemblance to the Belgians' corrupt and over controlling regime. The leader that the Congolese hoped for, Martin Fayulu, organized many anti-government protests rebelling against their fraudulent authority- this connects to the belief that Lumumba upheld for his people, expressing how he wanted them to "rid themselves of their enemies...and rise up as one to say no. " Conclusively, the events of the Cold war initiated changes in Congo that led to their independence from arbitrary leadership, similar to the downfall of Kabila's presidency.

Questions to Consider:
1. If you had to vote in the presidential election, who would you vote for and why?
2. What do you think about Congo's history of corrupt leadership? Do you think the country can be helped?
3. What do you think about the results of the election? Are the corruption accusations towards Tshisekedi valid?


15 comments:

  1. If I had to vote in the presidential election, I would vote for Tshisekedi. Although most people were angry that he won, his main priority was to increase the average income per person. He also strived to make the battle against poverty and in Congo, poverty is a very big issue. Tshisekedi might not have as much experience as his opponent Fayulu, but he can always learn and gain more experience with his new position as leader of Congo.

    ReplyDelete
  2. If I had to vote in the Congolese election, I would vote for Fayulu. He has more government experience in Congo, making him much more equipped to face the corruption and poverty of the country. Fayulu had also promised to redirect oil and mining contracts to benefit the majority of the impoverished Congolese population. Overall, he seems experienced and charismatic enough to support and lead Congo away from its current debacle. As for Tshisekedi, it seems very unlikely that someone without a large following or as much charisma could overtake someone who does that easily. I find this extremely suspicious, especially because his father, Etienne Tshisekedi, was the leader of the top leading political party in Congo. Also, according to the Washington Post (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/congo-court-upholds-felix-tshisekedis-election-win-despite-leaked-data-that-suggests-results-were-rigged/2019/01/20/7cdfe976-1bdd-11e9-8813-cb9dec761e73_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.780fc7188a6e), leaked data from the election commission and observer Cenco shows that Fayulu won the December 30th election with 60% of the votes, and that Tshisekedi has been largely silent while lists of other irregularities in the election mounted, such as how his running mate Vital Kamerhe was once the disliked former Congolese president Joseph Kabila's campaign manager. All in all, I feel like Fayulu would be a much better equipped and less corrupt leader than Tshisekedi.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. (This is Caroline Dixon by the way)

      Delete
  3. Looking through the history of the Democratic Republic of Congo, elections and the government have fallen prey to a lot of corruption. Since its independence in 1960, there has yet to be a peaceful transfer of power between leaders. Hopefully this transition between Kabila and Tshisekedi will be made with peace. Although Fayulu, the runner up candidate, did attempt to claim he was the "legitimate president", the constitutional court ruled his announcement to be false. The court did declare Tshisekedi to be the new president shortly after, as he gained the majority vote in the December election. Despite the allegations of corruption, I believe it will be more important to go through a smooth transition of power for the Congolese people, rather than spark a large investigation on supposed corruption. (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-46935898)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Like Caroline, I think that Martin Fayulu should've been elected instead of Felix Tshisekedi. At first, Felix Tshisekedi seemed like a strong contender for the election because of his background. According to BBC News (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-46507814), Tshisekedi's father Etienne Tshisekedi, the founder of the Union for Democracy and Social Progress Party, was very vocal about his scepticism towards his son's abilities. He was very demanding of his son and wasn't just going to give him a free pass. Also, Tshisekedi has been immersed in politics from a very young age, and had to work his way through the party. He has also studied in Brussels, Belgium and has made powerful connections and allies. On the other hand, Martin Fayulu was a former oil executive educated in the United States and France. Although impulsive at times, Fayulu has been a key figure in the marches against Joseph Kabila’s illegal extension of presidential term. Fayulu also has the support of former Vice President Jean-Pierre Bemba and self-exiled ex-provincial governor Moise Katumbi, both giants of the political world. Fayulu’s charisma and strong leadership skills is what appeals to the public, encouraging them to vote for him. Overall, both leaders are strong contenders for the election. However, the credibility of Felix Tshisekedi is at stake due to leaked data that showed Fayulu should’ve won the election by a large margin (https://www.thenational.ae/world/africa/democratic-republic-of-congo-rejects-request-to-suspend-election-results-1.815262). Regarding the country’s hectic political history of corrupt leadership, I have to agree with Natalie Graham. I hope that there will be a smooth transition in this transfer of power between leaders and that peace will be ensured.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I believe that Martin Fayulu should have been elected as president of the Congo because of the corrupt nature of Congolese politics. Two days ago (January 19), Martin Fayulu announced himself as president through Twitter (https://twitter.com/MartinFayulu/status/1086818772336414720?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet). This is an extremely bold move when one takes into account the unrest that is already occurring in the DRC. I don't think he should have done this, because it will only stimulate regrettable consequences for him in the future and serve to decay his reputation. Instead, he should have taken peaceful measures to prove his point that he should be the leader. In my opinion, the accusations of corruption against Tshisekedi are valid, because Fayulu was widely accepted front-runner and expected to assume presidency. I feel bad for the Congolese people, as they have endured poor leadership and poverty for reasons that could have been fixed by previous leaders.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I also think that Martin Fayulu’s decision to announce himself as president on twitter is a very bold move, however I respectfully disagree to your statement regarding how he should not have done so. I think that as a very popular presidential candidate, Fayulu must have known that Tshisekedi had corrupt intentions of winning the election- especially since, from the start, Fayulu had rendered significantly more support than Tshisekedi. I believe that with the knowledge he held of his opponent, it was right to take a stand against the “results” of the election, and claim what is rightfully his. In fact, there are many pieces of evidence that suggest fraud of some sort, such as a partnership between Joseph Kabila, the former president, and Tshisekedi, as well as the illegal disqualification of a million voters (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/congo-court-upholds-felix-tshisekedis-election-win-despite-leaked-data-that-suggests-results-were-rigged/2019/01/20/7cdfe976-1bdd-11e9-8813-cb9dec761e73_story.html?utm_term=.d602ffc3de5e). In the end, Congo’s elections have proven to be continuously corrupt as exhibited in this election.

      Delete
  6. Personally, I would agree with the author and vote for Fayulu, as from the article he seems to be rather experienced. The majority vote was for Tshisekedi, but there have been many accusations of corruption and deals made in order to help Tshisekedi win the election. If corruption was involved (which seems highly likely), it’s definitely not justified for Tshisekedi to win just because of his father or his ‘charisma’. Most of the leaders (there have only been 4 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-46935898) of the Democratic Republic of Congo have been violently taken out from office such as Patrice Lumumba, who was assassinated or Mobuto Sese Seko, who was overthrown. Similarly to the others, this December 30th race was very controversial and the results have increased the tension in the atmosphere in Congo. I think that Congo’s history of corrupt leadership must be helped before the political atmosphere gets out of hand.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I agree with the author in that I would have chosen Fayulu to be my leader. There is evidence (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jan/20/drc-opposition-leader-martin-fayulu-civil-disobedience-election-appeal-rejected) that Tshisekedi and Kabila made a deal to allow Tshisekedi to win the elections, which both Kabila and Tshisekedi have reluctantly confirmed is real evidence. The elections are most likely corrupt, due to the country's history of corrupt transfers of power, and because the fact that 80% of the voting machines mysteriously burning down only ten days prior to the elections seems fishy. I believe that if Fayulu were to have won the recent presidential elections in Congo, the country would have moved closer to becoming a less corrupt nation due to Fayulu's focus on human rights. Unfortunately, he had lost and all he is able to do now is to continue to fight back against corruption through peaceful campaigns. I think Congo needs a lot of support to fight against its corruption before the nation (might) needs to deal with the consequences of having a new deceitful ruler.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I believe with the author that Fayulu would have made a better president than Tshisekedi. Shown in the original article Fayulu seems to be much more experienced. Tshidekdi has only been in politics since 2011 whereas Fayulu has been in politic from 2006. But as stated in the original article “Tshisekedi never accepted his seat as he did not recognise his father's 2011 election defeat” Tshisekedi was elected into parliament for one of the major cities and could have further shown his experience in political but decides to not recognize that his father was unable to win the elections. I believe that the elections must be corrupt because Tshisekedi never started his own career, as he took over the party that his father created and seems very much to be riding off that fame. Also according to BBC, Tshisekedi it rumored to have stuck a deal with the last president, Kaliba, revealing that there is a lot of suspicion that runs throughout the government. (https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/world-africa-46935898) We also see with the last 4 presidents of the DRC have been violently taken out of office and also ha lots of controversy around their own election. I believe that his election is very questionable as just 10 days before the end of the election a fire burns 8,000 of the voting machines, which was 80% of the machines they had, which would cause many people to be unable to vote or not willing to as the time length to vote will be much longer. I believe that any corruption chargers against Tshisekedi are valid because though they may not be true or maybe, the DRC has a very corrupt government and any corruption claims given to any politician should be taken seriously.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I believe that although there are large disagreements, protests, and some violence, Congo is taking the necessary steps in order to form a better future for itself. Currently, Congo is in a troubled state where it cannot find a true democratic election in its vote for who the Congolese citizens find best to lead them (as seen in the quote "Violent protests followed two previous elections, in 2006 and 2011, when Mr. Kabila was declared the winner in votes that critics dismissed as rigged."). This is especially challenging when outside sources, such as churches and other countries, alter and interfere with elections. However, the Congolese demonstrations are a sign of change from this corrupt state, ultimately realizing that the democracy they seek is not what they get and that they need to fight for change. I however, also believe that precautions must be taken by the citizens to ensure that they are not voting for a corrupt power and instead are voting for those who are truly qualified to lead them. They should look at the qualifications of each of their leaders and verify that they are both accurate and not corrupt. Especially in such an impoverished region for its production, the Congolese should look into a future of a rule they can trust not only to tell the truth, but to also lead their country into a greater economic state. (source: "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/04/world/africa/fayulu-congo-presidential-vote-catholic.html")

    ReplyDelete
  10. In my opinion, the Congo is going in the right direction in trying to distance itself from the corruption and mismanagement of past leaders. Although it is hard to understand the true intentions of a leader until they are elected, it seems that both leading candidates want to help the country recover and prosper. In my opinion I would vote for Fayulu as he has lots more experience and the people of the country seem to have wanted him as the president. The result of the election going in favor of Tshisekdi does seem a little suspect and for me there should be some type re-vote considering how many votes were lost in the burning of those poles. An event like that which causes thousands of votes to be lost to me is a red flag for some type of foul play and for me would need some type of re-vote. I don't think this would be an unreasonable measure to take considering the past of the country and it leaders. I do believe that with the people's movements to get Kabila out of office, the country is going in the right direction. People are recognizing the corruption that is going on in their country and are taking a stand in saying that they will not be held under the rule of a corrupt leader any longer.

    ReplyDelete
  11. If I had to vote in Congo’s presidential election, I would vote for Martin Fayulu because he is more experienced and reliable in governing Congo. He had been previously known for leading protests against the past corrupt government, and was very expected to win the election. Fayulu held very confident plans to stabilize Congo’s economy. Tshisekedi also had similar plans, but he lacked the experience to carry them out. Though, according to bbc.com (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-46507814), Felix Tshisekedi is very educated in politics. Yet, this doesn’t necessarily support that he was experienced in governing. In the same article, he is also described as “courageous” by former chief of staff Albert Moleka, but his problem was “that he needs to figure out what his ultimate goal is.” This emphasizes Tshisekedi lack of ability to make beneficial and powerful decisions. The corruption accusations towards Tshishkedi may be a bit too extreme, but I still believe that the country’s anger towards his presidency is understandable.

    ReplyDelete
  12. In this presidential election, I would vote for Fayulu. In Congo's past there has been rule with corruption and mismanagement. The people of Congo have experienced many horrible outcomes because of this history of corrupt leadership. Fayulu was favored by the country since he led protests against the government's corruptness and wanted to create a stable country. In my opinion, he seems like he has more experience and knows what the people want in a leader. Tshisekedi may not be a fit leader because many of the people did not care for his lack of charisma and political experience, and was consequently not the most popular among the citizens of Congo. I think Congo's corrupt leadership created a difficult society for the Congolese to live in and in turn may elect a leader who seems more appealing to them. I believe that Congo can be helped because they have the resources (i.e. "Congo is rich in mineral resources") to help eliminate poverty and all Congo needs is a level-headed president to help use these resources in a substantial way.

    ReplyDelete